Research on the Practice and Effect of Ai Enabling Geological Engineering Teaching—Taking the Course of Principles of Engineering Geological Analysis as an Example

Authors

  • Wu Yang
  • Jun Chen
  • Yuanhua Xu
  • Yan Qiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202601_9(1).0023

Keywords:

Mineral resources, Minerals Market, Carbon peaking, Carbon neutrality, Policy recommendations, Global climate change

Abstract

By analyzing data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) and combining open data released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, this paper systematically examines the development pattern of the global mineral industry from four core dimensions: world economy, mineral exploration and development, supply-demand dynamics, and regulatory policies. It draws the following conclusions: the global mineral industry is currently confronted with prominent challenges. As the world’s largest producer of 30 out of the 43 critical raw materials listed by the European Union and the sole import source of 8 out of the 35 critical minerals for the United States, China has long been at the forefront of international strategic competition. Coupled with the IMF’s forecast of a mere 2.7% global economic growth rate in 2030 and the escalating risks in geopolitics as well as environmental, social and governance (ESG), the development of the global mineral industry is severely constrained. Meanwhile, mineral resource science has achieved three major transformations: in research content, it has shifted from describing regional resource and environmental characteristics to focusing on global environmental changes and human well-being; in research themes, it has moved beyond traditional pattern research to research on the coupling of patterns and processes, extending to issues related to sustainable development; and in research methodologies, it has tended to be integrated, systematic and quantitative. This multi-dimensional integrated development trend provides crucial scientific and technological support for achieving the global goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality and addressing climate change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhu Yongguang. Study on Factors Affecting the Availability of Strategic Key Mineral Resources and Its Mechanism [D]. China University of Geosciences, 2022. DOI: 10.27492/d. CNKI. Gzdzu. 2021. 000033.

[2] Gu Shuzhong, Yao Yulong, Shen Lei, etc Resource security and its basic attributes and research framework [J] Journal of Natural Resources, 2002 (03): 280-285.

[3] Gu Yifan, Wu Yufeng, Mu Xianzhong, et al Coupling configuration of native and renewable resources [J] China Industrial Economy, 2016 (05): 22-39.

[4] Guo Xiaoqian, Li Jianwu Summary of Key Mineral Evaluation Methods for Foreign Research Institutions [J] China Mining, 2017, 26 (09): 25-32.

[5] He Pengwei, Wang Chang, Zuo Lvshui, etc Research on the availability of high-tech minerals based on abandoned mobile phones [J] Resource Science, 2018, 03 (40): 589-599.

[6] Hou Zengqian, Chen Jun, Zhai Mingguo Current Status and Scientific Frontiers of Strategic Key Mineral Research [J] Science Bulletin, 2020, 65 (33): 3651-3652.

[7] Huang Kainan, Qiao Yuanbo An Analysis of the Co Evolution of Industrial Technology and Institutions - Based on the Learning Process of Multiple Agents [J] Economic Research, 2018, 12 (53): 161-176.

[8] Jia Genliang The Third Industrial Revolution and Industrial Intelligence [J] Chinese Social Sciences, 2016 (06): 87-106+206.

[9] Jia Liwen, Xu Deyi Research on the Impact of Regional Economy and Urbanization on Iron Ore Demand: Based on a Sample of 27 Countries [J] Resource Science, 2016, 38 (01): 144-154.

[10] Jinbei The Resource Route and Supply and Demand of China's Industrialization [J] China Industrial Economy, 2008 (02): 5-19.

[11] Li Kun, Wei Xiaoping Research on the Optimal Energy Resource Extraction Order Based on the "Scarcity Cost Behavior" Paradigm [J] China Industrial Economy, 2007 (03): 14-21.

[12] NASSAR N T, GRAEDEL T E, HARPER E M. By-Product Metals Are Technologically Essential but Have Problematic Supply [J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1(3): e1400180. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1400180.

[13] NASSAR N T, WILBURN D R, GOONAN T G. Byproduct Metal Requirements for U.S. Wind and Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Generation up to the Year 2040 under Various Clean Power Plan Scenarios [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 183: 1209-1226. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.062.

[14] LEE J, BAZILIAN M, SOVACOOL B, et al. Reviewing the Material and Metal Security of Low-Carbon Energy Transitions [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 124: 109789. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109789.

[15] Li Pengfei, Yang Danhui, Qu Shenning, et al Strategic Assessment of Rare Mineral Resources - From the Perspective of Strategic Emerging Industry Development [J] China Industrial Economy, 2014 (07): 44-57.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, W., Chen, J., Xu, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2026). Research on the Practice and Effect of Ai Enabling Geological Engineering Teaching—Taking the Course of Principles of Engineering Geological Analysis as an Example. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 9(1), 182-206. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202601_9(1).0023