Dilemmas and Institutional Innovation Paths of Synergy Among Running Subjects in Applied Undergraduate Education: From the Perspective of Institutional Change Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202603_9(3).0012Keywords:
Applied undergraduate education, Synergy among running subjects, Institutional change, Industry-education integration, Governance dilemma, Institutional innovationAbstract
As a core carrier connecting higher education and industrial development, applied undergraduate education is a key force for advancing the classified development of higher education, cultivating high-quality applied talents, and serving the high-quality development of regional economy and society. As the core support for the high-quality development of applied undergraduate education, the synergy efficiency of running subjects directly determines the depth of industry-education integration, the quality of talent cultivation and the ability to serve industries.However, the synergy among running subjects of applied undergraduate education in China is currently generally trapped in the dilemma of "formalistic cooperation", with the three core subjects of government, universities and enterprises presenting a governance deadlock of "government-driven, university-passive and enterprise-detached". Based on the core perspective of institutional change theory, combined with the quantitative analysis of industry-education integration policy texts in 31 provinces across China (2019-2023) and the cross-case comparison of three types of typical applied undergraduate universities, this paper systematically defines the theoretical connotation and core dimensions of the synergy among running subjects, deeply analyzes the manifestation and generation mechanism of the synergy dilemma, draws on the experience and enlightenment of international typical governance models, and finally puts forward the institutional innovation path of "symmetric rights and responsibilities, benefit sharing, and capacity synergy". It provides a solid theoretical support and operable practical guidance for breaking the dilemma of synergy among running subjects and promoting the connotative development of applied undergraduate education.
Downloads
References
[1] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Action Plan for the Construction and Development of Applied Undergraduate Universities (2021-2025) [Z]. Beijing: Ministry of Education, 2021.
[2] National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Pilot Implementation Plan for the Construction of Industry-Education Integration [Z]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Education, 2019.
[3] North D C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[4] Rhodes R A W. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability [M]. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.
[5] Coase R H. The Nature of the Firm [J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16): 386-405.
[6] Meyer J W, Rowan B. Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(2):340-363.
[7] Zhang W Y. The Logic of Institutional Change: Experiences and Lessons of China's Reform [M]. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2022.
[8] Liu X J. The Connotation and Development Path of Applied Undergraduate Education [J]. Educational Research, 2021, 42(08):102-112.
[9] Zhou G L. Dilemmas and Breakthroughs of Industry-Education Integration in Applied Undergraduate Education [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2022, 43(05):89-98.
[10] Li L G. Institutional Design for the Synergy of Running Subjects in Applied Undergraduate Universities [J]. Peking University Education Review, 2023, 21(01):1-13.
[11] Chen X M. Qualitative Research Methods and Social Science Research [M]. Beijing: Educational Science Press, 2020.
[12] Ye L. A Preliminary Study on the Methodology of Educational Research [M]. Beijing:Educational Science Press, 2019.
[13] Wang T X. Fundamentals of Talent Science [M]. Beijing: China Personnel Press, 2022.
[14] Li J. Research on the Mechanism of Industry Associations in Industry-Education Integration [J]. China Higher Education Research, 2022(07):78-85.
[15] Wang H. Research on the Synergy Mechanism of Running Subjects in Mixed-Ownership Applied Undergraduate Universities [J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2023, 44(04):99-107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




