Research and Practice on Teaching Innovation of Experimental Courses for Electrical Engineering Majors from the Perspective of Industry-Education Integration

Taking the Practical Course of Electrical Control and PLC as an example

Authors

  • Shanping Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202606_9(6).0017

Keywords:

Industry-education integration; Electrical control and PLC; Experimental teaching; Three-chain synergy; Three-step progression; Course-based ideological and Political education.

Abstract

In view of the problems existing in the experimental courses of electrical engineering majors, such as insufficient connection between course content and industry, weak personalized support of teaching resources, and weak engineering practice orientation, an innovative experimental teaching system of "three-chain synergy, three-stage progression, and six-step guidance" is constructed based on the CDIO engineering education model and cognitive apprenticeship theory. By integrating the problem chain, resource chain, and mentor chain throughout the entire process of pre-class, in-class, and after-class, and through the hierarchical advancement of virtual simulation practice, hardware operation verification, and engineering innovation improvement, reconstruct the three-stage experimental content of "comprehensive design - engineering practice - innovative application", and create an integrated resource ecosystem of "digital twin + virtual simulation + cognitive apprenticeship", Establish a closed-loop evaluation system of "evaluation - feedback - improvement" that is data-driven, multi-collaborative, and ideological and political integrated. The curriculum is deeply integrated with elements of ideological and political education such as engineering ethics, craftsmanship, and patriotism, achieving a trinity of knowledge imparting, ability development, and value shaping. The teaching reform has significantly enhanced students' engineering practice, innovative design and job fit capabilities. In the past three years, students have won more than 30 national competition awards, 49 provincial-level and above innovation and entrepreneurship projects, and 63 authorized patents. The course has been recognized as a provincial first-class undergraduate course, a provincial model course for ideological and political education, and has received numerous honors such as the first prize of provincial teaching achievement and the second prize of teaching achievement of the Chinese Society of Simulation. The achievements have been promoted and applied in more than 20 majors within the university and more than 10 institutions within and outside the province, providing replicable and promotable practical models for the cultivation of high-quality technical and skilled talents in the field of intelligent manufacturing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Garcés, G., Molinero-Pérez, N., Sanz-Benlloch, A., et al. (2026). Integrating Industry 4.0 and the sustainable development goals for curriculum reform in engineering education. In INTED2026 Proceedings (pp. 891–898). IATED.

[2] Padovano, A., & Cardamone, M. (2024). Towards human-AI collaboration in the competency-based curriculum development process: The case of industrial engineering and management education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100256.

[3] Jeyamala, C., Anitha, D., Baskar, S., et al. (2026). A four-phased project approach for enhancing CDIO skills in undergraduate engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 584–591.

[4] Mukherjee, M., Le, N. T., Tibben, W. J., et al. (2021). A novel instructional design based on cognitive apprenticeship model to enhance teaching network management. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE) (pp. 479–486). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52555.2021.9634615.

[5] Kubola, K., Jantarakongkul, B., & Boonmee, P., et al. (2022). Hands-on PLC training approach for IT students using virtual reality. In International Symposium on Industrial Engineering and Automation (pp. 319–329). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_28.

[6] Acker, J., Rogers, I., Guerra-Zubiaga, D., et al. (2023). Low-cost digital twin approach and tools to support industry and academia: A case study connecting high-schools with high degree education. Machines, 11(9), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11090860.

[7] Msambwa, M. M., Daniel, K., & Lianyu, C. (2024). Integration of information and communication technology in secondary education for better learning: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101203.

[8] Minoiu, C. A., Bǎrbulescu, R., & Soare, V. C. (2026). Interdisciplinary education as a foundation for value-based societal development. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 4(1), 51–59.

[9] Pavithra, C. R., Hari Haran, C., Hari Shanker, R., et al. (2025). Data-Driven LMS analytics for enhancing student performance in EdTech platforms. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Distributed Systems Security (ICBDS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

[10] Frady, K. (2023). Use of virtual labs to support demand-oriented engineering pedagogy in engineering technology and vocational education training programmes: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(5), 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2205166.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, S. (2026). Research and Practice on Teaching Innovation of Experimental Courses for Electrical Engineering Majors from the Perspective of Industry-Education Integration: Taking the Practical Course of Electrical Control and PLC as an example. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 9(6), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202606_9(6).0017