The Educational Value and Practical Path of the Heart-to-heart Talk Between the Organisers of The Highest Leadership Organization of Colleges and Universities in the New Era - Based on the Perspective of Ideological and Political Education of College Stud

Zhen Li

doi:10.6918/

Authors

Zhen Li School of Artificial Intelligence, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/

Keywords:

Organiser of the highest leadership organization in colleges and universities; development object; heart-to-heart talk; ideological and political education; education function.

Abstract

The task of cultivating morality in colleges and universities in the new era has been continuously deepened, and the development of members of the highest leadership organization in colleges has gradually been promoted from program standardisation to quality improvement and education guidance. The object of development is at an important stage of political identity, ideological growth and identity transformation. Its motivation to join the highest leadership organization, theoretical cognition, value choice and practical confusion need to be paid attention to in time. As an important participant in the development and education of members of the highest leadership organization, Organisers of the highest leadership organization in colleges and universities can deeply understand the ideological dynamics of students, convey the theoretical requirements and value concepts of the highest leadership organization in equal communication, and carry out targeted education in combination with individual reality through heart-to-heart talks with the development targets. Heart-to-heart talk not only undertakes the task of inspection and communication in the process of development of members of the highest leadership organization, but also has the functions of educating people such as ideological guidance, value shaping, growth and care. Based on the perspective of ideological and political education of college students, the article analyses the educational value of the heart-to-heart talk between the organisers of the highest leadership organization of colleges and universities and the development object, further explores the actual requirements of the educational function of the heart-to-heart talk, promotes the deep integration of the development work of the highest leadership organization and the ideological and political education of college students, and improves the relevance and effectiveness of the education and cultivation of the development object.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Cook Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1 42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700204

[2] Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525 545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162 009 9130 2

[3] Heron, M. (2018). Dialogic stance in higher education seminars. Language and Education, 32(2), 112 126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1417425

[4] Li, J. (2009). Fostering citizenship in China’s move from elite to mass higher education: An analysis of students’ political socialization and civic participation. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 382 398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.001

[5] Liu, X., Zhao, X., & Starkey, H. (2023). Ideological and political education in Chinese universities: Structures and practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(2), 586 598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1960484

[6] Simpson, A. (2016). Designing pedagogic strategies for dialogic learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 135 151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1038580

[7] Talbot, D., Denny, J., & Henderson, S. (2018). ‘Trying to decide … what sort of teacher I wanted to be’: Mentoring as a dialogic practice. Teaching Education, 29(1), 47 60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1347919

[8] Tu, Y. (2011). Citizenship with Chinese characteristics? An investigation into Chinese university students’ civic perceptions and civic participation. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(3), 426 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516 011 0140 4

[9] Yannuzzi, T. J., & Martin, D. (2014). Voice, identity, and the organizing of student experience: Managing pedagogical dilemmas in critical classroom discussions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 709 720. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901963

[10] Zhang, C., & Fagan, C. (2016). Examining the role of ideological and political education on university students’ civic perceptions and civic participation in China's mainland: Some hints from contemporary citizenship theory. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 15(2), 117 142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173416681170