Research on the Integration Mechanism of Collaborative Education of Marxist Philosophy Course and Professional Education in Universities

Authors

  • Yang Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202508_8(8).0002

Keywords:

Collaborative education; Marxist philosophy course; Professional education; Universities.

Abstract

Under the background of high-quality development of higher education, Marxist philosophy course, as the core of ideological education, is out of touch with professional education, which restricts the cultivation of all-round high-quality talents. Collaborative education emphasizes resource integration and complementary advantages, and its theoretical logic lies in following the principles of systematicness, homogeneity, complementarity and innovation, and realizing the deep integration of Marxist philosophy and professional education through practical paths such as curriculum system integration and teaching method innovation. The analysis of the present situation shows that, despite the policy promotion and practical exploration, it still faces multi-dimensional dilemmas such as superficial, rigid grafting, one-way output and short capacity. Therefore, an integrated model is constructed, which includes four mechanisms: system guarantee, teaching implementation, teacher collaboration and evaluation feedback. Among them, the system guarantee mechanism starts with top-level design and curriculum construction, clarifies the division of responsibilities and goals, and promotes the modularization and ideology of the curriculum; The teaching implementation mechanism focuses on the integration of teaching content, method innovation and the construction of interdisciplinary case base to enhance students' comprehensive ability; Teachers' collaborative mechanism breaks down discipline barriers and promotes teachers' exchanges and cooperation through teachers' team building and ability improvement; The evaluation feedback mechanism focuses on process evaluation and dynamic adjustment to ensure the effect of collaborative education. The purpose of this study is to provide theoretical and practical guidance for solving the "two skins" problem of university ideology and professional education, cultivating socialist builders and successors with both ability and political integrity, promoting the effective transformation of Marxist philosophical theory into professional practice, and realizing the organic unity of moral education and professional talent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Su Peijun, & Ren Ping. (2022). On the Ideological Guidance Principles for Constructing "Marxist Philosophy of Chinese Discourse." Marxism and Reality, 74(2), 40-46.

[2] Yuan Zusha. (2021). Thematic Transformation and Theoretical Innovation of Marxist Philosophy in Contemporary China. Marxism and Reality, 73(4), 74-80.

[3] Chen Xianda, & Zang Fengyu. (2021). Academic Self-Awareness and the Centennial Exploration of Sinicization of Marxist Philosophy. Marxism and Reality, 73(6), 1-10.

[4] Zhang Ruifang, & Xu Pengjie. (2022). The Logical Path of Ideological Courses in Universities Leading Ideological Construction in the New Era. Theory and Practice of Education, 42(6), 44-47.

[5] Wang Yan. (2021). Research on Educational Issues Based on Marxist Practical Philosophy—A Review of Research on Educational Issues Based on Marxist Practical Philosophy. Journal of Educational Development, 41(24), 85-85.

[6] Liu Jintian. (2022). Marxist Philosophy Is a Practical Humanistic Value Philosophy. Henan Social Sciences, 30(7), 97-117.

[7] Jia Keqing. (2024). Jon Elster's Analysis and Construction of Marxist Political Philosophy. Journal of Jinan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 46(6), 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, Y. (2025). Research on the Integration Mechanism of Collaborative Education of Marxist Philosophy Course and Professional Education in Universities. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 8(8), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202508_8(8).0002