The Evaluation Index System and Synergistic Development Pathways for AI-Empowered Professional Ethics among Primary and Secondary School Teachers

Zhimiao Yang; Lei Xiang; Yufei Xia; Jinhua Hai; Fengrui Gu

doi:10.6918/IJOSSER.202605_9(5).0022

Authors

Zhimiao Yang
Lei Xiang
Yufei Xia
Jinhua Hai
Fengrui Gu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202605_9(5).0022

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence; Teachers’ Professional Ethics; Synergistic Paths; Evaluation Index System.

Abstract

In the process of empowering teacher professional development with intelligent technology, professional ethics of teachers are facing new demands for high-quality development. Currently, the cultivation of professional ethics among primary and secondary school teachers confronts three core challenges: a deviation between policy orientation and practical implementation, weakening of objective evaluation and diagnostic function, and lag in the expansion of intelligent application and ethical regulation. To address these issues, this research applies synergy theory, aiming to reveal how intelligent technology, as a control parameter, facilitates the synergistic evolution of the teacher professional ethics governance system. The specific research objectives are to: (1) systematically observe the states of subsystems, (2) establishing evaluation indicators for teachers in the era of AI , and (3) confirm the upgrade to the collaborative path. Methodologically, this study is based on the analysis of 18 teacher ethics policy texts and related literature. It adopts a mixed-method approach, such as grounded theory, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation, and questionnaire surveys. Through this approach, we construct an index system for teacher ethics development, consisting of 4 first-level Indicators (thought, behaviour, competency, institution) and 13 second-level indicators. This study seeks to resolve the synergistic dilemma of teacher ethics evaluation in educational digitalization and provide theoretical support and practical basis for the cultivation of ecological governance system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alfiras, M. I. I., Emran, A. Q., & Mohamed, A. M. (2025). Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: a systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y

[2] Anastasiou, S., & Belios, E. (2020). Effect of age on job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion of primary school teachers in Greece. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(2), 644–655.

[3] Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUM032

[4] Azevedo, M. M., & Duarte, S. (2018). Continuous enhancement of science teachers’ knowledge and skills through scientific lecturing. Frontiers in public health, 6, 41. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00041. eCollection 2018.

[5] Bai,J.Y.(2024).Ethical Governance of Educational AI: Real Challenges and Implementation Pathways.Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2024, 12(02),37-47. DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2024.02.004.

[6] Barrett, D. E., Neal Headley, K., Stovall, B., & Witte, J. C. (2006). Teachers’ perceptions of the frequency and seriousness of violations of ethical standards. The Journal of Psychology, 140(5), 421-433.DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.140.5.421-433

[7] Brownlie, N. (2025). Smarter, Not Harder: Conceptualising Ethical AI Integration for Assessment and Wellbeing in Online Teacher Education. Online Teacher Education in the Evolving Technological Landscape.

[8] Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 157-165. doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z.

[9] Crawford,K., & Calo,R.(2016).There is a blind spot in AI research.Nature, 538(7625), 311-313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a.

[10] Dai,L. & Zhu,Z.T.(2024).The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Governance of Moral Risks:Clarification of Issues and Targeted strategies.Journal of the Chinese Society of Education,(12):31-37.

[11] Drew, S. V., Heyboer, K. A., Paddock, B. J., McLachlan, W. M., & Nicoll-Senft, J. (2024). Letter from a teacher: A plea for school-university partners to rethink educator burnout and attrition through an ethic of care. PDS Partners: Bridging Research to Practice, 19(2), 126-139. DOI:10.1108/pdsp-01-2024-0003

[12] Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The effects of educational artificial intelligence-powered applications on teachers’ perceived autonomy, professional development for online teaching, and digital burnout. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57-76.

[13] Education International,2004.Declaration on professional ethics.Brussels.Retrieved from:https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/21519:ei-declaration-on-professional-ethics.Accessed November 25, 2025.

[14] Fan,B.B, & Li,J.(2024).The Construction Path of Digital Village at County-level from the Perspective of Collaboration Based on the Case Study of Suning County, Hebei Province. Issues in Agricultural Economy,(11):33-47.DOI:10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2024.11.001.

[15] Fang,X.Y., Chen,H.Y, Wang,Y.L., & Lin,C.D.(2002).Teacher’s Implicit Theory of Teacher’s Professional Moral. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences), (01), 28-33. https://doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2002.01.004.

[16] Fukuda-Parr, S., & Gibbons, E. (2021). Emerging Consensus on ‘Ethical AI’: Human Rights Critique of Stakeholder Guidelines. Global Policy 12, S6 (2021), 32––44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12965.

[17] Gai,K., & Li,G.(2020).Achievements,Problems and Strategies of the Development of Teaching Staff in Primary and Secondary Schools——Based on the Survey of Work and Life Styles of Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools in Eight Provinces of China.Journal of South China Normal University(Social Science Edition), (06), 107-116+191.

[18] Gao,H.B. (2023).Research on the Progress and Influencing Factors of the Construction of Teachers’ Ethics and Conduct in Primary and Secondary Schools:Based on the Survey of Teacher Ethics in Beijing.Educational Science Research, (8), 83-90. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1009-718X.2023.08.013.

[19] Gao,X., Wei,F., & Zhou,X.L.(2023)An Ecosystem Perspective on Why Teachers Burnout:Analysis based on Ecosystem Theory.Research in Educational Development,43(02), 44-51. DOI:10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2023.02.003.

[20] Guo, J., & Rong Q. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Empowers Educational Equity:International Consensus, Implementation Challenges, and Practical Pathways. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition). 51(02), 247-258+315. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2025.02.020.

[21] Haken, H. (1977). Synergetics. Physics Bulletin, 28(9), 412.

[22] Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Gruber, N., & Leahy, S. (2025). Social-emotional learning and generative AI: A critical literature review and framework for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(3), 312-328.

[23] Hooshyar, D., Šír, G., Yang, Y., Kikas, E., Hämäläinen, R., Kärkkäinen, T., ... & Azevedo, R. (2025). Towards responsible AI for education: Hybrid human-AI to confront the Elephant in the room. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16148.

[24] Hwang,G.J., & Chen,N.S.(2023).Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in education: applications, challenges, and future research directions.Journal of Educational Technology&Society, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0014.

[25] Karakus, M., Toprak, M., Caliskan, O., & Crawford, M. (2024). Teachers’ affective and physical well-being: emotional intelligence, emotional labour and implications for leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 469-485. DOI:10.1108/ijem-07-2023-0335

[26] Lin, L., Zhou, D., Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). A systematic review of big data driven education evaluation. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241242180.

[27] Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 Level: an extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 13922.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3.

[28] Li,J.L, & Liang,H.Q.(2025).How to Achieve Teacher Workload Reduction and Education Quality Improvement?Research on the Mechanism of the Effect of Teacher Workload on Student Development.Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition),13(04), 91-103. DOI:10.19563/j.cnki.sdjk.2025.04.009.

[29] Lin,Y.G, & Ping,X.M. (2021).Policy Content and Policy Tools of Teachers' Morality Construction in Primary and Middle Schools——Analysis Based on Eight Important Policy Texts.Global Education, 50(5), 69-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9670.2021.05.006

[30] Liu, H., Yin, Z., Chen, S., Yang, Y., & Tian, H. (2022). Development of an assessment of ethics for Chinese physical education teachers: a study using the Delphi and expert ranking methods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 11905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911905

[31] Lu,Y., & Tang,X.Y.(2025).Morphological Hierarchy and Developmental Pathways of Classroom Teaching Enabled by Generative Artificial Intelligence.e-Education Research,46(06), 75-82+106. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.06.010

[32] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.2018.Ten Guidelines for Professional Conduct of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in the New Era.Beijing.Retrieved from : https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5443907.htm

[33] MIT(2024).AI guidance[EB/OL].[2025-11-27].https://ist.mit.edu/ai-guidance.

[34] Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and information technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.

[35] Nguyen, T. N., & Truong, H. T. (2025). Trends and emerging themes in the effects of generative artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2613. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16124.

[36] Oberg, G. (2025). Moral injury in teaching: the systemic roots of ethical conflict and emotional burnout in education. Educational Review, 1-24.

[37] Qian,Q.W., Deng,S.L, Wang,D.Y, & Xia,S.D.(2025).Construction and Empirical Study of the Evaluation Index System of Personal Information Security Sense.Library and Information Service,69(02), 13-23. DOI:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.02.002.

[38] Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of mathematical psychology,15(3), 234-281. DOI:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

[39] Shen,Y.,Fang,S.M.,Liu,C.C.,Wang,Y.M., & Wang,Q.(2024).The Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Applications: Cases and Reflections.Open Education Research,30(06), 39-47. DOI:10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2024.06.005.

[40] Song, S. (2024). The study of convergent AI education and its ethical task for children in the digital age. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 29(1), 81-100.

[41] Tabassum, M., & Alam, M. M. U. (2024). Exploring Multifaceted Expectations from Teachers: An Analysis from Guardians’ and Students’ Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 6(2), 141-155.DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v6i2.464.

[42] Tagare, D., Karki, T., & Yu, W. (2025). K-12 teachers’ ethical competencies for AI Literacy: Insights from a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 105435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105435.

[43] Tan,C.B., & Yao,Y. (2022).On the Logical Transformation of Teachers' Morality Construction in the New Era.China Educational Technology,(10), 27-31. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2022.10.008.

[44] Tempelaar, D., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2024). Dispositional learning analytics and formative assessment: an inseparable twinship. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 57.

[45] The National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. 2015. Model Code of Ethics for Educators. Washington.Retrieved from:https://education.hanover.edu/admitted/model.php#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20Model%20Code%20of%20Ethics,are%20faced%20with%20the%20complexities%20of%20P-12%20education.

[46] Tripathi, A., & Kumar, V. (2025). Ethical practices of artificial intelligence: A management framework for responsible AI deployment in businesses. AI and Ethics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00670-3

[47] Vineis, V., Perelli, G., & Tolomei, G. (2025). Beyond Predictions: A Participatory Framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision-Making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08542.

[48] Wang, F., Zhou, J., & Fan, C. (2024). Exploring the factors influencing public intention for spectator sports consumption based on grounded theory. Scientific reports, 14(1), 8221. DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-59049-9

[49] Wu,D.,& Guo,Q. (2024).The Ethical Challenges of Smart Technology:Representation, Abduction, and Alleviation. Open Education Research, 30(4), 20-27. http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2024.04.003.

[50] Wu,D.& Wu,Y.X.(2024).Impact of Algorithmic Transparency of Personalized Recommendation on Users’ Perceived Trustworthiness.Information Studies:Theory & Application,47(11), 91-100. DOI:10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2024.11.010.

[51] Yang,J.F, & Chu,J.(2024).The Ethical Risks and Regulated Principles of Artificial Intelligence in Education.Journal of the Chinese Society of Education,(11), 21-27.

[52] Yao, L., & Wang Q. (2025). Legal Regulation of Risks in Generative Artificial Intelligence Educational Applications. Tsinghua Journal of Education. 46(06), 131-142. DOI:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2025.06.013112.

[53] Zhou,Y.F.,Tan,C.H.,Zhou,Y.,Tu,R.D.,&Li,Y.P.(2025).Construction of Service Effectiveness Evaluation Indicator System of Preprint Platform and Empirical Research.Library and Information Service,69(02), 56-66. DOI:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2025.02.006.