Financial Risk Management Using a Bayesian Network in Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Middle School Construction Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202611_9(11).0007Keywords:
Public-private partnership; project financing; Bayesian network; financing risk; education infrastructure; risk allocation.Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) can help finance public education facilities, but their long contracts and reliance on future cash flows mean that risks rarely occur in isolation. This paper uses a Bayesian network to examine financing risk in a Beijing middle-school construction case. The model draws on a risk framework from the literature, a project questionnaire, and case information on government, market, and social conditions. The original study distributed 130 questionnaires and reported 100 returns, although it also classified 30 responses as invalid; this inconsistency limits the precision of the survey evidence. Within the reported results, market and social-environment risk was 63.4% and government risk 63.0%. Changing market demand (34%) and lower-than-expected market returns (23%) were the largest sub-factors. The wider case matrix also reported government credit risk at 35%, approval delay and late completion at 20% each, and legal change at 5%. By showing how these factors depend on one another, the network provides a practical basis for allocating and monitoring risks at different project stages. The case suggests that robust demand forecasts, transparent public commitments, meaningful public participation, and regular updating of risk probabilities are more useful than a static risk checklist. The reported percentages should nonetheless be treated as case evidence rather than population estimates until the underlying survey records can be reconciled.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang, S., Gao, Y., Feng, Z., & Sun, W. (2015). PPP application in infrastructure development in China: Institutional analysis and implications. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.011.
[2] Li, B., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., & Hardcastle, C. (2005). Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500041537
[3] Zhang, K. (2011). The PPP project risk allocation method based on game theory research. Doctoral dissertation, Hunan University.
[4] Wang, S. Q., Tiong, R. L., Ting, S. K., & Ashley, D. (2000). Evaluation and management of foreign exchange and revenue risks in China's BOT projects. Construction Management & Economics, 18(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370885
[5] Fang, Y., Liu, J., Xie, J., Lu, X., Zeng, Y., & Xie, H. (2018). Public participation PPP project decision-making based on Bayesian networks. Journal of the Guangdong University of Technology, 35(3), 79–86.
[6] Yet, B., Constantinou, A., Fenton, N., Neil, M., Luedeling, E., & Shepherd, K. (2016). A Bayesian network framework for project cost, benefit and risk analysis with an agricultural development case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 60, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.007
[7] Ke, Y., Wang, S., & Chen, B. (2008). Risk-sharing of infrastructure PPP projects. Construction Economics, 4, 31–35.
[8] Ai, B., & Lu, X. (2008). Comparison of PPP financing models and risk prevention in government procurement. Suo, 4, 19–21.
[9] Peng, Q. (2007). Application of the PPP method in infrastructure construction financing in universities. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 10(460), 33–34.
[10] Chen, B., & Xu, C. (2011). Risk allocation method of PPP financing model. Transportation Technology and Economy, 13(1), 126–128.
[11] Li, H., & He, Y. (2000). Dynamic risk analysis of project financing. Quantitative Economic and Technical-Economic Research, 5, 46–48.
[12] Du, Y., & Yin, Y. (2011). Review on risk-sharing of PPP projects. Construction Economics, 4, 29–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




