From Design to Replication: A Zero-Code AIGC Workflow for Blended Teaching Reform in the Marketing Channels Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202611_9(11).0023Keywords:
Marketing Channels; AIGC; blended teaching; curriculum-based ideological and political education; process-oriented assessment.Abstract
This paper reports the design and preliminary implementation of a blended teaching model for Marketing Channels, a core compulsory course of the Marketing major, in which AI-generated content (AIGC) tools and curriculum-based ideological and political education (CIPE) are integrated. The traditional classroom of the course suffers from lecture-dominated delivery, delayed feedback, static cases, label-style value inculcation, and a closed-book final examination. We restructure each session into a four-phase cycle: AI-generated contextual introduction, project-based task solving, ideological micro-debate, and AI instant feedback. A zero-code “light AI application” workflow built on a structured prompt library allows non-technical teachers to generate localized cases, dynamic data tables, and micro-videos on demand. A “channel justice” thematic thread runs through knowledge points such as channel functions, channel conflict, and online channels. The closed-book examination is replaced by a process-oriented system that combines AI instant feedback, peer review, teacher value comments, and an AI-assisted channel diagnosis report. This paper focuses on the design side of the reform: how a college-level teaching reform project turns an AI-empowerment scheme into an operable workflow, a process-oriented assessment system, and a replication plan for related courses. For non-technical teachers, this workflow gives a practical, low-cost way to use generative artificial intelligence without sacrificing the teacher's role in value guidance.
Downloads
References
[1] Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2020). Guideline for Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education in Institutions of Higher Education (Jiao Gao [2020] No. 3).
[2] Guo, K. (2024). EvaluMate: Using AI to support students' feedback provision in peer assessment for writing. Assessing Writing, 61, 100864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100864
[3] Pan, G., & Ni, J. (2024). A cross sectional investigation of ChatGPT-like large language models application among medical students in China. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 908. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-04448-6
[4] Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
[5] Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutym, A., Lajevardi, R., Laux, L., Liebner, M., Lindner, F., Pfeiffer, J., Sailer, M., Schlaile, M., … Zierke, M. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[6] Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00412-8
[7] Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475922
[8] Li, X. G., & Yang, J. (2021). Channel management (in Chinese). China Renmin University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




