Reform and Practice of Curriculum Ideological and Politics for Postgraduate Course of Forestry RobotTechnology Based on the Three-Stage Transition

Ying Xin; Yaoxiang Li; Haiting Di; Guoqi Xu; Haibin Wang

doi:10.6918/IJOSSER.202611_9(11).0025

Authors

Ying Xin College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Yaoxiang Li College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Haiting Di College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Guoqi Xu College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Haibin Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202611_9(11).0025

Keywords:

Graduate; Course ideological education; Robot; Innovation ability; High-level thinking.

Abstract

In the new era, advancing curriculum-based ideological and political education for postgraduate courses is imperative for moral education and high-quality postgraduate cultivation. This paper took the ideological and political education construction of the graduate course "ForestRobot Technology" as the object. The course had constructed a three-stage ideological and political teaching model of "frontier embedding - critical construction - innovative transfer". It adopted teaching strategies such as tracking academic frontiers, engineering ethics analysis, and innovative design challenges, and used the "motion analysis of forest industry robots" chapter as a typical case to demonstrate the differentiated design of ideological and political teaching at the graduate level. The practice showed that this model had achieved some results in stimulating academic interests, cultivating critical thinking, and enhancing the ability to solve complex problems, providing a reference for the ideological and political education of graduate professional courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] People’s Daily. (2016, December 9). Integrating ideological and political work throughout the entire process of education and teaching to open up a new prospect for the development of China’s higher education.

[2] Yu, J. F., & Liu, H. Q. (2025). An analysis of integrated innovation in graduate education based on the new characteristics of generative artificial intelligence. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, (9), 28–34.

[3] Ministry of Education, National Development and Reform Commission, & Ministry of Finance. (2020, September 4). Opinions on accelerating the reform and development of graduate education in the new era.

[4] Li, W. L., & Fan, P. (2022). The three dimensions of curriculum-based ideological and political education construction for graduate courses. Journal of Yili Normal University, 40(2), 7–12.

[5] Li, X. Q., & Zheng, W. (2026). Exploration of the path for integrating “dual ideological and political education” in courses and scientific research into graduate courses in agriculture and forestry ecology. Smart Agriculture Guide, 6(5), 164–167.

[6] Zhou, Z. Y., & Yu, Q. (2025). Challenges and breakthroughs in curriculum-based ideological and political education construction for graduate specialized courses under the “grand ideological and political education” framework. University Education, 43(6), 133–136.

[7] Li, S. Y., Wang, X. F., Yuan, X. F., et al. (2026). Exploration of teaching models for graduate courses in the category of “contaminated land remediation” under the background of ecological civilization construction. Journal of Higher Education, (2), 118–121.