A Study on Pathways for Shipping Energy Emission Reduction from the Perspective of International Maritime Environmental Law

Authors

  • Jingru Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202511_8(11).0011

Keywords:

Shipping energy, Emission reduction pathways, International Maritime Organization, International maritime environmental law

Abstract

At present, the shipping industry consumes a vast amount of fossil fuels each year, with carbon dioxide emissions accounting for about 3% of global total emissions. In addition, pollutants such as sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides released during shipping pose severe threats to the environment of coastal areas and to human health. In response to this situation, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has established a series of conventions and regulations, including the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships and the IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships, setting explicit targets and standards for emission reductions in the shipping industry. Conducting an in-depth study of energy emission reduction pathways in shipping from the perspective of international maritime environmental law is of great significance for promoting the green transformation of the shipping industry, achieving global climate governance goals, protecting the marine ecological environment, and fostering the sustainable development of international trade. Taking this as a starting point, this paper analyzes the current status of energy consumption and emissions in shipping, reviews relevant IMO regulations, identifies technical challenges, economic cost pressures, and policy coordination dilemmas faced by shipping energy emission reduction, and explores multidimensional pathways. The aim is to provide theoretical support and practical reference for the industry’s transition to low-carbon development and the achievement of global maritime environmental goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Whitbourn, S. (2025). Regulating the decarbonisation of shipping: Providing legal protection against the risks presented by alternative fuels. Yearbook of International Disaster Law Online, 6(1), 71–92.

[2] UN (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available online at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (Accessed March 08, 2025). (A/RES/70/1).

[3] Arda, A. (2025). Internal pools as stepping stones: Green digital ship twins and retrofitting for FuelEU compliance through pooling mechanism and contractual implications. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 10(1), Article 207.

[4] Orysiak, E., & Shuper, M. (2025). Economic impacts of decarbonizing the LNG fleet in the Baltic Sea. Energies, 18(18), 4975.

[5] Zhu Y. (2024). A quasi-normative conflict: resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action. Rev Euro. Compar. Int. Environ. Law 33, 183–193.

[6] Kumar, R., Sebe, M., Yao, F., Laura, R. V., & Salo, K. (2025). Shipping fuel pathways in a changing climate: A prospective foresight study for 2050. Marine Policy, Article in press.

[7] UNCTAD (2024). World investment report 2024. Available online at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2024_en.pdf (Accessed March 08, 2025).

[8] IMO. (2024). Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI. London: International Maritime Organization Publishing.

[9] International Chamber of Shipping. (2024). Guidance for Shipping Companies on Addressing Conflicts between CBAM and IMO Rules. London: International Chamber of Shipping.

[10] Wang, L., & Zhang, H. (2024). Legal coordination of regional and global shipping decarbonization policies: A case study of the EU CBAM and IMO strategy. Marine Policy, 162, 105987.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, J. (2025). A Study on Pathways for Shipping Energy Emission Reduction from the Perspective of International Maritime Environmental Law. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 8(11), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202511_8(11).0011