Generative AI Supports Path Exploration for Deep Learning in Middle School Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202512_8(12).0030Keywords:
Generative AI, Deep learning, Junior high school science, Teaching path, Empirical research, Academic literacyAbstract
The Compulsory Education Curriculum Plan (2022 Edition) emphasizes the integration of scientific deep learning and digitalization, and generative artificial intelligence injects new momentum into classroom reform. At present, junior high school science teaching faces bottlenecks such as limited experimental conditions, shallow cognition, and lagging feedback, which restricts the development of students' higher-order thinking. In this study, a three-path model of "phenomenon visualization-problem ladder-feedback precision" was constructed, and a scientific inquiry task template was developed based on AI tools, and a controlled experiment was carried out in the eighth grade "Material Change" unit (AI support in the experimental class vs. traditional teaching in the control class). Empirical data show that this path significantly improves students' complex problem-solving rate, experimental design innovation and evidence correlation ability, and promotes the implementation of scientific literacy-based goals. In the future, we will deepen the dual-track integration of AI and physical experiments, build a regional shared task library, and provide a universal paradigm for the digital transformation of science education.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhang Chuansui. Ten Years of Basic Education Curriculum Reform: Policy Guidance, Major Innovations and Future Prospects: Based on the Interpretation of the Compulsory Education Curriculum Plan (2022 Edition) [J]. Curriculum. Teaching materials. Teachings, 2024, 44(1): 13-22
[2] Zhang Yinjiang. Teachers regard AIGC as a teaching and research partner and need to establish three concepts [J]. Educational Science Forum, 2025(23):1-1
[3] RATTEN V, JONES P. Generative artificial intelligence, (ChatGPT): implications for management educators [J]. The international journal of management education, 2023, 21(3):100857.
[4] Wang Xuenan, Li Yongzhi. Artificial Intelligence and Educational Reform [J]. Electronic Education Research, 2024, 45(8):13-21
[5] Ye Pingzhi, Qiao Tianqi, Wang Xinxin. Preschool Education Research, 2025(4):58-66
[6] Fu Liang, Zhu Wenhui. SOLO Classification Theory: A Feasible Theoretical Fulcrum for Integrated Design of Teaching-Learning-Assessment [J]. Educational Theory and Practice, 2025, 45(4):44-51
[7] FLAVELL J H, 1987. Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition [M]//WEINERTF, KLUWE R eds., Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum: 21-29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




