A Study on the Constituent of the Flipped Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202603_9(3).0019Keywords:
Constituent elements of the flipped classroom, Traditional teaching elements, BoundariesAbstract
The flipped classroom integrates traditional teaching elements and achieves essential transformation via digital media, forming a new model distinct from conventional classrooms and general online education. This paper analyzes its core components, including lectures, reading, discussion, assessment, curriculum organization, and credit recognition, to reveal operational features, innovations, and dilemmas. It identifies digital reconstruction, copyright balance, communication optimization, assessment improvement, personalized design, and identity accreditation as critical issues. The flipped classroom is defined by being massive, open, free, and online, with core values of educational equity, teaching innovation, and research reform. This study clarifies its boundaries with other educational models and provides a theoretical reference for its high-quality development.
Downloads
References
[1] Donald A. Bligh. What’s the Use of Lectures. Bass Press, New York, 2000.
[2] Salman Khan. Why Long Lectures Are Ineffective. Time. October 2, 2012. http://ideas.time.com/2012/10/02/why-lectures-are-ineffective/.
[3] George F. Wakefield. A Brief History of Textbooks: Where Have We Been All These Years. In Proceedings of the Authors Conference on Textbooks and Scholarly Works (1998). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED419246.pdf.
[4] For a detailed discussion of open-stack access, see professor Peter Suber (Cambridge University). Open Access. MIT Press, 2012.
[5] See Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. University of Chicago Press, 2011.
[6] See Dr. Katrina A. Meyer. Face-to-Face vs. Threaded Discussion: The Role of Time Constraints and Higher-Order Thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol.7, No.3(2003).
[7] See Ola Naga. The Effectiveness and Development of Online Discussions. Journal of Online Learning, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Spring 2009).
[8] See Jeffrey R. Young. What a Tech Sart-Up’s Data Say About What Works in Classroom Forums. The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 21, 2012. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/what-a-tech-start-ups-data-say-about-what-works-in-classroom-forums/38960?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en.
[9] See Delmar Lewis. The Future of the University. The New York Times, November 20, 2012, p. A1.
[10] See Steven Leckart. Stanford’s Teaching Experiment Will Permanently Change How Universities Educate. Wired, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Spring 2012).
[11] See Daphne Koller. What We’re Learning from Online Education. TED Talk, August 2012. http://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_education.html.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
