The Impact of AI Speaking Companion Tools on Speaking Anxiety Among Undergraduate Non-English Majors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202604_9(4).0019Keywords:
English speaking anxiety, AI speaking practice tool, second language acquisition, educational strategiesAbstract
Amid the growing prevalence of English worldwide, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the field of English learning. However, the wide variety of AI tools, coupled with the absence of reasonable, unified, and standardized criteria, has led to considerable anxiety among college students in their English learning process under such a disorganized influence of AI. Against this backdrop, this study adopts the AI speaking practice tool Sky Lingo for experimental intervention. A total of 36 eligible participants were recruited and selected to take part in a nine-day experiment, during which they used the “just chat” mode of the AI tool for at least 20 minutes of speaking practice each day. Data were analyzed in SPSS using data preprocessing, normality tests, paired-samples t-tests, and correlation analysis. The results indicate a significant difference in participants’ speaking anxiety scores before and after the intervention (t = 15.447, P < 0.001), with anxiety levels markedly decreasing. This tool aligns with the core tenets of Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis, effectively alleviating fear of negative evaluation and communication apprehension by lowering the affective filter and avoiding interpersonal evaluation pressure. It should be noted that the participants in this study were limited to a specific College English Test Band 4 (CET-4) score range and had a moderate sample size; thus, the generalizability of the findings requires further validation with larger, more diverse samples. This research confirms the practical effectiveness of the AI speaking practice tool Sky Lingo in reducing English speaking anxiety, offering practical insights for integrating AI technology into college English speaking instruction, supporting teaching optimization and students’ speaking proficiency improvement, and providing a foundation for future practical exploration.
Downloads
References
[1] Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.
[2] Guo, Y., & Xu, J. F. (2014). A multidimensional study on English learning anxiety among non-English majors. Foreign Language World, (04), 2–11.
[3] Xiong, H. L. (2007). An analysis of factors affecting oral English anxiety among English learners. China Adult Education, (13), 178–179.
[4] Wu, W. S., Lu, J. M., & Guo, W. (2009). A cluster analysis of foreign language oral anxiety among college students. Psychological Science, 32(05), 1091–1094.
[5] Wang, Y. (2016). An investigation on English learning anxiety of non-English majors under the flipped classroom model. Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 52(04), 134–139.
[6] Li, H. (2013). An empirical study on the effect of communication training on foreign language communication apprehension among non-English postgraduates. Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University, 12(03), 122–124.
[7] Sun, Y. H. (2022). Multimodality: An effective strategy to alleviate students’ oral anxiety. Shanghai Research on Education, (10), 87–92.
[8] Wang, X. J. (2024). A study on college oral English teaching strategies empowered by AI technology. Overseas English, (19), 141–143.
[9] Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




