Evaluation of the Impact of The “Double Reduction” Policy on Off-campus Training Behavior and Education Expenditure of Different Families: Difference-in-Differences Analysis Based on CFPS Data

Authors

  • Yushan Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202510_8(10).0028

Keywords:

Off-campus training; education expenditure; difference-in-differences model; CFPS.

Abstract

As a key education reform in China, the “double reduction” policy aims to ease students’ academic burden and family education expenditure, and promote educational equity. Evaluating its actual effect is crucial for optimizing education governance and improving policy implementation. This work, using 2018 (pre-policy) and 2022 (post-policy) panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), applies the difference-in-differences model to assess the policy's impact on families’ off-campus training participation and education expenditure, with heterogeneity analysis and robustness tests enhancing conclusion reliability. Empirical results show contrary-to-expectation findings: off-campus training participation rate rose abnormally, from 3.0% in 2018 to 30.2% in 2022 (subject training: 2.6% to 22.6%; non-subject training: 1.6% to 20.3%). Family off-campus training expenditure dropped significantly by 94.2% (logarithmic result), but its share in total family education expenditure remained stable. Heterogeneity analysis reveals low-income households saw the largest expenditure decrease (≈99.8%), while middle-and high-income households had more significant increases in training participation (44.22%-43.33%); urban-rural gaps persist, with urban families showing higher participation and expenditure. This study highlights the need to strengthen policy implementation consistency, standardize off-campus training supervision, address potential educational inequality from increased participation among middle-and high-income families, and alleviate family anxiety by expanding high-quality public education resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xue, E., Li, J. (2024). The new pattern of the development of the education system under the "double reduction" policy - a retrospective and forward-looking analysis based on the implementation of the "double reduction" policy. Education Development Research, 44 (18),36-45.

[2] Daniel, S., Orestes, P. H., Joe, L. (2018). Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments. American Sociological Review,83(3),475-507.

[3] Lee, S., Shouse, C.R. (2011) The Impact of Prestige Orientation on Shadow Education in South Korea. Sociology of Education,84(3):212-224.

[4] original. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review,11(1),14-24.

[5] original. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review,11(1),97-108.

[6] Choi, J., Cho, R.M. (2016). Evaluating the effects of governmental regulations on South Korean private cram schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education,36(4),599-621.

[7] Pang, X., Xue, H., Xiao, F. (2025). The impact of the "double reduction" policy on the participation and expenditure of students ' families in off-campus training. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 43 (01), 17-36.

[8] Zhou, Z., Lei, X., Shen, Y. (2023). education burden reduction, family education expenditure and education equity. Economics (Quarterly), 23 (03), 841-859.

[9] Meng, J., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, M. (2024). Family education expenditure and physical and mental health-Evaluation of the effect of the "double reduction" policy. Journal of Economics and Management, 3 (01), 27-54.

[10] Dong, H., Huang, L., Jiang, J., Yu, Y., Ji, X., Chen, K. (2023). Research on the change of urban family education expenditure willingness from the perspective of "double reduction" -Based on the analysis of the survey data of primary schools in Nanjing. Modern Business Industry, 44 (10), 156-159.

[11] Han, X. (2025). Research on the institutional dilemma and countermeasures of the implementation of the "double reduction" policy. University, (14), 35-38.

[12] Wei, Y. (2024). Short-term effect evaluation of the "double reduction" policy: an analysis based on the China Education Finance Family Survey. Peking University Education Review, 22 (01), 155-173 + 192.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Y. (2025). Evaluation of the Impact of The “Double Reduction” Policy on Off-campus Training Behavior and Education Expenditure of Different Families: Difference-in-Differences Analysis Based on CFPS Data. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 8(10), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202510_8(10).0028