Gender's Impact on AP Scores: Analysis and Teaching Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202511_8(11).0021Keywords:
AP Scores, Gender Disparity, Intersectionality, Instructional Strategy, Self-Selection, Equity in EducationAbstract
This study employs an intersectional framework to analyze gender disparities in Advanced Placement (AP) exam scores, moving beyond binary comparisons. Through stratified regression analysis of 2022-2023 data, we demonstrate that gender gaps are not uniform but are significantly mediated by structural factors including linguistic background, disability status, and economic disadvantage. Crucially, the relationship between gender and achievement reverses or intensifies within specific subgroups—for instance, a female advantage among native English speakers transforms into a male advantage among English Language Learners. These findings refute innate explanations, underscoring the roles of sociocultural construction, psychological internalization, and systemic educational practices. Our analysis strongly supports the "self-selection" hypothesis, positing that score differentials largely stem from pre-existing filters shaping exam participation. In response, we propose a comprehensive instructional framework integrating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy (CSP), Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and project-based learning to mitigate stereotype threat and foster self-efficacy. We conclude that addressing AP score disparities requires systemic interventions targeting the intersecting roots of inequality within and beyond the classroom.
Downloads
References
[1] Riegle-Crumb, C., & Humphries, M. (2012). Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gender & Society, 26(2), 290-322.
[2] Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
[3] Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. H. (2014). The role of advanced high school coursework in increasing STEM college matriculation. Journal of Educational Research, 107(4), 285-297.
[5] Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305-328.
[6] Waitoller, F. R., & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319-356.
[7] Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murnane & G. Duncan (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91-116). Russell Sage Foundation.
[8] Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267-301.
[9] Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. American Association of University Women.
[10] Ba Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-629.
[11] Ndura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
[12] Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[13] Yang N, Quan H, Guo Z. The influence of motivational climate on the physical activity adherence among junior high school students: the mediating effect of achievement goal orientation [J]. PLOS One, 2024, 19(12): e0315831.
[14] Zysberg L, Schwabsky N. School climate, academic self-efficacy and student achievement [J]. Educational Psychology, 2021, 41(4): 467-482.
[15] Geng Q, Amini M, Hashim S N A B, et al. The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and learning interest in the relationship between teaching style and math behavior engagement among junior high school students in China [J]. PLoS ONE, 2024, 19(10): e0311959.
[16] Okumuş Ö, Öztürk M. Metacognitive training for algebra teaching to high school students: an action research study [J]. Learning and Motivation, 2024, 88: 102064.
[17] Chang C C, Chen Y K. A transdisciplinary STEM course integrated through project-based learning on robotics: perspective from teacher and student feedback [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2025, 45(2): 661-676.
[18] Sparks D M, Przymus S D, Silveus A, et al. Navigating the intersectionality of race/ethnicity, culture, and gender identity as an aspiring latina STEM student [J]. Journal of Latinos and Education, 2023, 22(4): 1355-1371.
[19] Guo W, Lau K L, Wei J, et al. Academic subject and gender differences in high school students’ self-regulated learning of language and mathematics [J]. Current Psychology, 2021, 42(10): 7965-7980.
[20] Kapucu S, Bahcivan E. High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy in learning physics and attitudes toward physics: a structural equation model [J]. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2015, 33(2): 252-267.
[21] Ugwuozor F O. Constructivism as pedagogical framework and poetry learning outcomes among nigerian students: an experimental study [J]. Cogent Education, 2020, 7(1): 1818410.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




