Research on the Characteristics of Rawls's Theory of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202507_8(7).0011Keywords:
Theory of justice; original position; contract theory; utilitarianism; distributive equality.Abstract
Rawls’s theory of justice constitutes a foundational intervention in contemporary political philosophy, seeking to reconcile the demands of liberty and equality through a rearticulated contractarian framework. It endeavors to transcend classical utilitarianism, construct a procedural conception of justice, and reexamine the moral basis of the basic structure of society. These philosophical innovations are systematically expressed in his conception of “justice as fairness.” This article critically examines the distinct features of Rawls’s theory, with special emphasis on its normative coherence, procedural justification, and implications for democratic legitimacy and distributive justice.
Downloads
References
[1] Yao Dazhi: What Is Justice: Research on Contemporary Western Political Philosophy (People's Publishing House, China 2007), p.34-39.
[2] Rawls: A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, United States 1999), p.130.
[3] Hong Tao: The Problem of the State of Nature Before Kant: From Hobbes to Rousseau, Fudan Political Science Review, Vol.13 (2013), p.231-248.
[4] Zhang Fengyang et al.: Keywords in Political Philosophy (Jiangsu People's Publishing House, China 2014), p.230.
[5] Nozick: Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, United States 1974), p.297.
[6] Hayek: Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy (Routledge, United Kingdom 2012), p.124.
[7] Zhou Lian: History of Western Political Philosophy (Volume III) (Renmin University of China Press, China 2018), p.537.
[8] Mill: On Liberty (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom 1989), p.76.
[9] Zhang Guoqing: Rawls's Theory of Well-Ordered Society and Its Critique, Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), Vol.56 (2014) No.4, p.16-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




